<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can Wikipedia be trusted?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geckoandfly.com/2007/03/08/can-wikipedia-be-trusted/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geckoandfly.com/2007/03/08/can-wikipedia-be-trusted/</link>
	<description>Blogger Templates, Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:53:56 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: edward duff</title>
		<link>http://www.geckoandfly.com/2007/03/08/can-wikipedia-be-trusted/#comment-93572</link>
		<dc:creator>edward duff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geckoandfly.com/2007/03/08/can-wikipedia-be-trusted/#comment-93572</guid>
		<description>Personally i think it is disgraceful that anybody can even submit information on wikipedia when they feel like it,a lot of people have trusted this website for many years as a legitimate site,schools,colleges,universities etc.I believe this should be secured and that no-one other than the real professors should have access to it,i hope this comment bears some significance in realizing that this shouldn&#039;t be the way,i always lead to believe that the information i was perusing was in fact true but now i know some of this was someones personal amusement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally i think it is disgraceful that anybody can even submit information on wikipedia when they feel like it,a lot of people have trusted this website for many years as a legitimate site,schools,colleges,universities etc.I believe this should be secured and that no-one other than the real professors should have access to it,i hope this comment bears some significance in realizing that this shouldn&#8217;t be the way,i always lead to believe that the information i was perusing was in fact true but now i know some of this was someones personal amusement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Bogupper</title>
		<link>http://www.geckoandfly.com/2007/03/08/can-wikipedia-be-trusted/#comment-19802</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Bogupper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 13:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geckoandfly.com/2007/03/08/can-wikipedia-be-trusted/#comment-19802</guid>
		<description>Wikipedia is used around many schools and preschoolers use it but 
it&#039;s content is not cencored and 
when a person searches for;Japanese for example
and finds there way through a web of links and comes to Hentai.
Know lets say they click on the picture of a homeless man selling so called &#039;Hentai&#039; and sees pictures of porno graphic content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wikipedia is used around many schools and preschoolers use it but<br />
it&#8217;s content is not cencored and<br />
when a person searches for;Japanese for example<br />
and finds there way through a web of links and comes to Hentai.<br />
Know lets say they click on the picture of a homeless man selling so called &#8216;Hentai&#8217; and sees pictures of porno graphic content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
