200 lashes for Saudi gang rape victim 200鞭刑沙特阿拉伯轮奸受害者

November 21, 2007 · Filed Under 2007年11月21日提交的下 World and Politics世界政治

A recent headline of最近的标题 Telegraph UK电报英国 , to make a long story short, a Saudi woman was sentenced to 200 lashes and 6 months prison for being a gang rape victim, the initial sentence was 90 lashes but was subsequently increased to 200 because the women was found guilty of influencing the media - sympathy. ,使一个长期的故事,总之,沙特女子被判处200鞭刑和6个月的监狱作为一个轮奸受害者,初步一句是90鞭刑,但随后上升至200 ,因为妇女被裁定有罪,影响媒体-同情。

What a bunch of idiots, how could they do this?什么一群白痴,怎么能这样做呢? Isn’t it wrong morally and ethically to punish the victim?是不是错了道义上和道义上的惩罚受害者?

According to the Arab News newspaper, the woman was gang-raped 14 times.据阿拉伯新闻报道,该名女子被轮奸了14倍。 Her offence was in meeting a former boyfriend, whom she had asked to return pictures he had of her because she was about to marry another man.她的罪行是在会议的前男友,其中她已要求返回的照片,他的她,因为她即将结婚的另一名男子。 The couple was sitting in a car when a group of seven Sunni men kidnapped them and raped them both, lawyers in the case told Arab News.该对夫妇在当时坐在一辆汽车时,一组7逊尼派男子绑架,他们和强奸他们两人,律师在案件告诉阿拉伯新闻。 The former boyfriend was also sentenced to 90 lashes for being with her in private.前男友也被判处90睫毛被与她在私人楼宇。 - Source: -资料来源: Telegraph UK电报英国

The Islamic Sharia law is not in tune with modern society, these religious laws does not comply with today’s plural ethic modern society; we’re heading towards a global village, a multi cultural world.伊斯兰教法是不符合现代社会,这些宗教的法律不符合今天的文字:伦理的现代社会;我们正在走向一个全球村,一个多文化世界。 Coming from an Islamic country - Malaysia with a religious composition of 60% Muslims and 40% others, and an ethic composition of 50% Malays, 25% Chinese, 8% Indians and the rest, I need to stress that Islamic Sharia Law doesn’t work, one of the reason - What if a Muslim and non-Muslim are involved in an argument say divorce?来自一个伊斯兰国家-马来西亚与宗教组成的6 0% ,穆斯林和4 0% ,其他人,和伦理组成的5 0% ,马来人, 2 5%的中国人, 8 % ,印度人和休息,我要强调的是,伊斯兰教法不'科技工作,原因之一-什么,如果穆斯林和非穆斯林所涉及的在一个论点说,离婚? or Khalwat (Close Proximity with the opposite sex)?或khalwat (接近与异性) ? or marriage?或结婚?

These Islamic Sharia Laws are written hundred of years ago by some Muslim scholar, it does make sense during their golden age, close proximity was deem as something unhealthy during the olden Chinese culture, same goes with the western culture where they segregate children, church goers and many more according to gender, but these rules evolve, the entire world evolve and adapt to current changes and demand.这些伊斯兰教法律的书面一百多年前由一些穆斯林学者,但这使意识在他们的黄金时代,接近被认为由于一些不健康的,在古代中国文化,同样与西方文化的地方分隔开来,他们的子女,教会人士还有更多的按性别,但这些规则的演变,整个世界的发展和适应当前的变化和需求。

Religion should be a personal matter, religion, politics, and state should not mix together.宗教应该是一个个人的事,宗教,政治,和国家不应该混合在一起。

Tags:标签: , , , ,

We Recommend我们建议

Stories you may be interested in based on past browsing的故事,您可能有兴趣在过去的基础上浏览

Comments评论


  1. cashmarble.com

    November 21st, 2007 2007年11月21日
    1 1

    Some law are no longer logically practice.一些法律不再是合乎逻辑的做法。 it has to be revamp and the people should now start using their brain!它必须重整和人民的现在应该开始使用他们的大脑! stupid damn people!愚蠢的可恶的人!


  2. nanda南达

    November 21st, 2007 2007年11月21日
    2 2

    it’s not because sharia or something else impersonal, there always ba confused thinking had been played there, so it’s not depend on which more modern, so without referring to religion directly, why does people tends to corrupt the law?这不是因为伊斯兰教或有其他客观的,总有广管局混淆思想,已发挥有,因此它不是依赖于更多的现代,所以没有提到宗教直接,为何不人往往腐败的法律?


  3. Debalina debalina

    November 29th, 2007 2007年11月29日
    3 3

    I totally agree with you.我完全同意你。
    I was shocked the moment I read newspaper article on this.我感到非常震惊,目前我看过报纸文章在此。 I believe that every religion or as Muslims call it, rules, should change with time and adapt itself.我相信每一位宗教或作为穆斯林称之为,规则,应随时间的变化和适应本身。
    After reading different articles and newspapers and some more research on this issue, I found out that the Lawyer for the victim, after the trial was interviewed by media where it was expressed that the punishment for the culprits is very less as compared to the damage they have done.后读不同的文章和报纸和一些更多的研究,在这个问题上,我发现该律师为受害人,在审判后的采访媒体,而有人认为,惩罚罪犯是非常少相比,所造成的损害有工作要做。 And that’s then the Lawyer was debarred from practising.并且当时的律师被禁止执业。
    I don’t see any confusion here, as Nanda expressed.我看不出有任何混乱,在这里,作为南达表示。
    It is just that the books and the rules and the judgements are age old, women are still mere slaves or sex-slaves, nothing else.它只是说,书籍和议事规则和判断是年龄岁,妇女仍然仅仅是奴隶或性奴隶,没有别的。
    Without adaption, it would hard to survive.没有适应,它将难以生存。 Darwin’s theory !达尔文的理论!

Leave a Reply 离开的答复