200 lashes for Saudi gang rape victim 200鞭刑沙特阿拉伯輪姦受害者

November 21, 2007 · Filed Under 2007年11月21日提交的下 World and Politics世界政治

A recent headline of最近的標題 Telegraph UK電報英國 , to make a long story short, a Saudi woman was sentenced to 200 lashes and 6 months prison for being a gang rape victim, the initial sentence was 90 lashes but was subsequently increased to 200 because the women was found guilty of influencing the media - sympathy. ,使一個長期的故事,總之,沙特女子被判處200鞭刑和6個月的監獄作為一個輪姦受害者,初步一句是90鞭刑,但隨後上升至200 ,因為婦女被裁定有罪,影響媒體-同情。

What a bunch of idiots, how could they do this?什麼一群白痴,怎麼能這樣做呢? Isn’t it wrong morally and ethically to punish the victim?是不是錯了道義上和道義上的懲罰受害者?

According to the Arab News newspaper, the woman was gang-raped 14 times.據阿拉伯新聞報導,該名女子被輪姦了14倍。 Her offence was in meeting a former boyfriend, whom she had asked to return pictures he had of her because she was about to marry another man.她的罪行是在會議的前男友,其中她已要求返回的照片,他的她,因為她即將結婚的另一名男子。 The couple was sitting in a car when a group of seven Sunni men kidnapped them and raped them both, lawyers in the case told Arab News.該對夫婦在當時坐在一輛汽車時,一組7遜尼派男子綁架,他們和強姦他們兩人,律師在案件告訴阿拉伯新聞。 The former boyfriend was also sentenced to 90 lashes for being with her in private.前男友也被判處90睫毛被與她在私人樓宇。 - Source: -資料來源: Telegraph UK電報英國

The Islamic Sharia law is not in tune with modern society, these religious laws does not comply with today’s plural ethic modern society; we’re heading towards a global village, a multi cultural world.伊斯蘭教法是不符合現代社會,這些宗教的法律不符合今天的文字:倫理的現代社會;我們正在走向一個全球村,一個多文化世界。 Coming from an Islamic country - Malaysia with a religious composition of 60% Muslims and 40% others, and an ethic composition of 50% Malays, 25% Chinese, 8% Indians and the rest, I need to stress that Islamic Sharia Law doesn’t work, one of the reason - What if a Muslim and non-Muslim are involved in an argument say divorce?來自一個伊斯蘭國家-馬來西亞與宗教組成的6 0% ,穆斯林和4 0% ,其他人,和倫理組成的5 0% ,馬來人, 2 5%的中國人, 8 % ,印度人和休息,我要強調的是,伊斯蘭教法不'科技工作,原因之一-什麼,如果穆斯林和非穆斯林所涉及的在一個論點說,離婚? or Khalwat (Close Proximity with the opposite sex)?或khalwat (接近與異性) ? or marriage?或結婚?

These Islamic Sharia Laws are written hundred of years ago by some Muslim scholar, it does make sense during their golden age, close proximity was deem as something unhealthy during the olden Chinese culture, same goes with the western culture where they segregate children, church goers and many more according to gender, but these rules evolve, the entire world evolve and adapt to current changes and demand.這些伊斯蘭教法律的書面一百多年前由一些穆斯林學者,但這使意識在他們的黃金時代,接近被認為由於一些不健康的,在古代中國文化,同樣與西方文化的地方分隔開來,他們的子女,教會人士還有更多的按性別,但這些規則的演變,整個世界的發展和適應當前的變化和需求。

Religion should be a personal matter, religion, politics, and state should not mix together.宗教應該是一個個人的事,宗教,政治,和國家不應該混合在一起。

Tags:標籤: , , , ,

We Recommend我們建議

Stories you may be interested in based on past browsing的故事,您可能有興趣在過去的基礎上瀏覽

Comments評論


  1. cashmarble.com

    November 21st, 2007 2007年11月21日
    1 1

    Some law are no longer logically practice.一些法律不再是合乎邏輯的做法。 it has to be revamp and the people should now start using their brain!它必須重整和人民的現在應該開始使用他們的大腦! stupid damn people!愚蠢的可惡的人!


  2. nanda南達

    November 21st, 2007 2007年11月21日
    2 2

    it’s not because sharia or something else impersonal, there always ba confused thinking had been played there, so it’s not depend on which more modern, so without referring to religion directly, why does people tends to corrupt the law?這不是因為伊斯蘭教或有其他客觀的,總有廣管局混淆思想,已發揮有,因此它不是依賴於更多的現代,所以沒有提到宗教直接,為何不人往往腐敗的法律?


  3. Debalina debalina

    November 29th, 2007 2007年11月29日
    3 3

    I totally agree with you.我完全同意你。
    I was shocked the moment I read newspaper article on this.我感到非常震驚,目前我看過報紙文章在此。 I believe that every religion or as Muslims call it, rules, should change with time and adapt itself.我相信每一位宗教或作為穆斯林稱之為,規則,應隨時間的變化和適應本身。
    After reading different articles and newspapers and some more research on this issue, I found out that the Lawyer for the victim, after the trial was interviewed by media where it was expressed that the punishment for the culprits is very less as compared to the damage they have done.後讀不同的文章和報紙和一些更多的研究,在這個問題上,我發現該律師為受害人,在審判後的採訪媒體,而有人認為,懲罰罪犯是非常少相比,所造成的損害有工作要做。 And that’s then the Lawyer was debarred from practising.並且當時的律師被禁止執業。
    I don’t see any confusion here, as Nanda expressed.我看不出有任何混亂,在這裡,作為南達表示。
    It is just that the books and the rules and the judgements are age old, women are still mere slaves or sex-slaves, nothing else.它只是說,書籍和議事規則和判斷是年齡歲,婦女仍然僅僅是奴隸或性奴隸,沒有別的。
    Without adaption, it would hard to survive.沒有適應,它將難以生存。 Darwin’s theory !達爾文的理論!

Leave a Reply 離開的答复