自由西藏運動和北京奧林匹克2008年

2008年4月25日 · 歸檔下 世界和政治


圖像來源： Wikipedia

我通常不張貼接觸在社會政治，但強烈感覺關於自由西藏問題，受到了世界的注意由於的文章 北京奧林匹克2008年.

從一個個人觀點，我相信西藏應該，不充分地，是部份地自由的，并且我強烈是反對中國的政策鞭打西藏人』文化并且用中國文化替換它。 相信鞭打另一個人的文化應該走談話的人和吃食物的一個唯一類型在他們的整個生活中，因為那是什麼單作和容易的方法瞭解下側單作是非除食物之外。 是，同樣食物在他們的整個生活中。

現在，什麼使我困惱關於自由西藏運動是談話在人權由西方人，美國人，澳大利亞人，并且加拿大人是殖民化產品，他們的祖先謀殺了當地人并且搶奪他們他們的土地，逐字地抹他們從世界。

中國媒介在中國言： 「殖民化這些產品應該包裝他們的袋子和去回到歐洲，在他們談論中國拓殖的西藏之前」。

我說，那是傲慢的。 兩中國人、美國人、澳大利亞人，加拿大人和許多錯誤，沒人是否是完善的，但它是否是為竊賊堅硬的對試驗每竊賊為竊取某事？

西藏將是西藏，它應該是部份地自由的-政治上，但不是軍事和經濟上。 西藏非常有丟失，如果它從是我的觀點的中國任意打破，很好，至少，而不是大家分享那。

我們應該閉上一隻眼睛關於這個整體西藏論點？ I say, if the Americans and Australians and many more believes in the idea of an independent Tibet because the people of Tibet wants to be free, then they should leave Iraq, because I doubt the Iraqi wants them to be there, isn’t democracy beautiful? It is only beautiful if everyone listens to you.

Tags: , , , , ,

We Recommend

Stories you may be interested in based on past browsing

Comments


  1. Rob O.

    April 25th, 2008
    1

    I definitely have to differ with you on this one. Tibet should be wholly free, just as they were before the Chinese seized the country. If Tibet can’t sustain itself without Chinese oppression, then so be it - let them fizzle out and die as a free nation.

    But China hasn’t dominated that country for the last 5 decades out of charity and good will. They’re trying to put their own wannabe-Dalai Lama into place, fer cryin’ out loud!! They persecute, torture, and sexually abuse monks & nuns for their Buddhist beliefs.

    If we pulled this same kind of land grab crap - with Mexico, for example (which I totally advise!) - the global community would lynch us. Genocide & horrendous religious persecution on this grand a scale would not be tolerated anywhere else in the world. So why is it that China’s actions have been tolerated and overlooked for so long?


  2. Steven

    May 1st, 2008
    2

    hey Rob, check this video out.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQhDll880Y4&feature=related


  3. David

    May 3rd, 2008
    3

    Rob,

    “Freedom” of a nation touches on the issue of sovereignty, something that Tibet hasn’t had for hundreds of years (maybe thousands? Look up history of Tibet). The point is, even if Tibet traces its history back thousands of years when it was not part of China, how would you feel if Native Americans wanted the whole continent back? By your argument they are rightfully entitled to it and that the U.S. should “let them fizzle out and die as a free nation” if they wish to be so. Or do you feel that Native Americans are fully integrated into American society and that we can rightfully occupy their land? I can assure you that many Native Americans are no more “assimilated” than Tibetans are by Chinese culture.

    I identify with the author’s view. But I feel that openness and transparency in Tibet is the only way to solve the issue. We would never be able to fix everything if we don’t even know what exactly is happening there.

Leave a Reply