<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Download Google Chrome Browser</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geckoandfly.com/2008/09/03/download-google-chrome-browser/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geckoandfly.com/2008/09/03/download-google-chrome-browser/</link>
	<description>Blogger Templates, Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:25:27 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: victor teixeira</title>
		<link>http://www.geckoandfly.com/2008/09/03/download-google-chrome-browser/#comment-78150</link>
		<dc:creator>victor teixeira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 03:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geckoandfly.com/?p=2408#comment-78150</guid>
		<description>All the features you described were taken from Opera.
The Opera browser has ALL that &quot;new&quot; features for a long time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the features you described were taken from Opera.<br />
The Opera browser has ALL that &#8220;new&#8221; features for a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: media buff</title>
		<link>http://www.geckoandfly.com/2008/09/03/download-google-chrome-browser/#comment-77963</link>
		<dc:creator>media buff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 23:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geckoandfly.com/?p=2408#comment-77963</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m willing to try it out just to see if it works more efficiently than FireFox... if it&#039;s faster than Firefox, has tabs and isn&#039;t IE, then i&#039;ll use it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m willing to try it out just to see if it works more efficiently than FireFox&#8230; if it&#8217;s faster than Firefox, has tabs and isn&#8217;t IE, then i&#8217;ll use it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
